On CNN, Paul Begala just called Barack Obama "Change Incarnate." What's next? A Chalcedonian formulation of Obama's two natures?
What’s Wrong with the World is dedicated to the defense of what remains of Christendom, the civilization made by the men of the Cross of Christ. Athwart two hostile Powers we stand: the Jihad and Liberalism...read more
On CNN, Paul Begala just called Barack Obama "Change Incarnate." What's next? A Chalcedonian formulation of Obama's two natures?
Comments (12)
Let's be fair when manning the Heresy Watch. Liberals substituted ideology for religion long ago, but conservatives are closing the gap.
Thompson's intro after the McCain video was a Resurrection narrative about McCain rising from a box. I was relieved McCain didn't ascend to the stage in a white suit.
Most disturbing on another level, was the part in the video discussing Commander John S. McCain's decision to "carpet bomb" Hanoi, while his son was held captive there. Carpet bombing a city. Only a prig would call that barbaric.
Posted by Kevin | September 5, 2008 12:52 AM
Frank,
Your comment about the Chalcedonian Obama is interesting. But it raises a question: Can a thing have two natures if it has no substance?
Posted by Michael Bauman | September 5, 2008 7:30 AM
Mike:
You nominalist you! :-)
Frank
Posted by Frank Beckwith | September 5, 2008 8:41 AM
Kevin--can you post a citation on Adm McCain's carpet bombing of Hanoi? Or suggest a place to go for more info?
Posted by KEITH PAVLISCHEK | September 5, 2008 9:10 AM
Keith, it is within the narrative of the vidoe introducing McCain last night;
http://www.johnmccain.com/blog/Read.aspx?guid=811cbbf8-9905-4326-b486-bb3701182fdd
Posted by Kevin | September 5, 2008 9:57 AM
I think they're Obamaphysites. His human nature was dissolved like a drop of honey in the sea. All that is left is Change.
Posted by CJ | September 5, 2008 11:02 AM
Posted by thebyronicman | September 5, 2008 11:10 AM
I think it behooves an investigation into whether Obama has one will or two. Obamaphysitism may very well be compounded (but necessarily so) with Monobamathelitism.
Posted by Mike Burgess | September 5, 2008 3:07 PM
But what I want to know is how exactly did Evolution overshadow St. Ann Dunham while not impeding in the natural biological process involving Mssr. Obama Sr.? One certainly doesn't want to run the risk of the postmodern equivalent of Nestorianism, does one?
Posted by Mike Burgess | September 5, 2008 3:16 PM
He already has two natures, --------------------- id est Mohammadenism and Christianity.
Because his Christianity, his black supremacism, is so freighted with heresy, as to be "Christian" in name only.
Did you guys notice at his convention that no close friends, no friends for that matter, were introduced to tell us what they knew first hand about Barrack Hussein.
No friends.
Isn't that interesting.
Posted by Dan | September 5, 2008 7:41 PM
"No friends."
Niccolo Machiavelli approves.
Posted by The Florentinian Stranger | September 5, 2008 9:13 PM
So do the muslims!
For friendship with the infidels is barred.
Posted by Dan | September 5, 2008 9:49 PM