What’s Wrong with the World

The men signed of the cross of Christ go gaily in the dark.

About

What’s Wrong with the World is dedicated to the defense of what remains of Christendom, the civilization made by the men of the Cross of Christ. Athwart two hostile Powers we stand: the Jihad and Liberalism...read more

Anti-Christian White Supremacist Shoots Three People at Holocaust Museum

Update: Looks like this guy was a 9/11 "truther" who hated Bush, McCain, and "neo-cons." (This is not to say, of course, that everyone who holds these views approves of the Holocaust Museum shootings. Given recent goings on here, I thought I had to say that.)

According to the initial press reports, the name of the alleged shooter is James W Von Brunn (age: 89). I did some sleuthing and found some of his sick writings online. Here's an excerpt from one of the works of this pathetic loser:

As duped Aryan sheep begin to understand the "Holocaust" they also begin to better understand Christianity. Both have similar origins. Both have identical objectives.... The New Testament was written in Greek. Paul - who believed the World was flat, that Joshua made the sun stand still, and Jehovah spoke from a burning bush -- wrote one-third of it, perhaps more. The events described in the 24 Books are often contradictory, fail the time-line, defy both archaeology's and nature's immutable laws, and are suicidal if practiced. Nevertheless, the shamans bought it, taught it, and the illiterate public was coerced, brainwashed, threatened, tortured, murdered, and enthralled. The Encyclopedia Britannica states that over 6,000 major redactions exist between the Septuagint (translation of Aramaic into Greek) and its St. James biblical translation.

The Gospels profess that only Christians may enter Yahweh's Kingdom of Heaven. To qualify, among other demands, Christians must LOVE THEIR ENEMIES (Jews); give away their personal belongings; eschew knowledge; judge not, despise nature, abandon earthly pleasures, acknowledge that all YHWH's children are equal; and above all else worship YHWH, the jealous, wrathful, vengeful, unforgiving, genocidal, anthropomorphic tribal god (Jesus' father) created by Hebrews in their image and likeness. Omnipotent, omniscient YHWH promises Hebrews that they alone shall inherit the earth, that it is commendable to steal from Gentiles, better yet -- kill them. Whereas Gentiles, if they fail to worship YHWH, are transported straight to Hell. And it is written, "A little child shall lead them."

These dangerous, imbecilic, concepts, tenets, and teachings, often treasonous, DESTROYED the Roman Empire and drenched the soil of Europe with Aryan blood for almost 2000 years!

The Big Lie technique, employed by Paul to create the CHRISTIAN RELIGION, also was used to create the HOLOCAUST RELIGION ... CHRISTIANITY AND THE HOLOCAUST are HOAXES.

"Christianity" destroyed Roman Civilization. The "Holocaust" Religion is destroying Western Civilization. The Aryan gene-pool dies, "unwept, unhonored and unsung."

I apologize if this makes you ill, for it makes me ill as well. But sometimes we have to see evil for what it is, and that anti-Semitism is ultimately anti-Christian (even when it is embraced by those who claim to follow Christ).

(cross-posted on Southern Appeal)

Comments (34)

Eh, those Nietzscheans!

There's simply no telling what they might do next.

I'm waiting for somebody in the MSM to wring their hands about the "climate of hate" created by Jeremiah Wright that made this happen. :)

Another person attacking poor, oppressed Christians! Won't Christians ever get a break?

Scary...

it is a good thing he learned his degree from Encyclopedia Britanica!

That guy was probably diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic at some point...

Couple good things to take home from this.

1 For 89 year old killers, it's tough dodging bullets.

2 They aren't making them like Jimmy Von Brunn anymore.

Wow, Hardy, you're right. Those Christians sure deserve what they have coming to them. Oppressors like those Christianists should watch out, when Hardy enters the room!

The Roman Empire was ruled by Aryans? Who knew?

Forgive me if I'm not suprised. I currently live in Europe and in certain circles this kind of thinking has become rather fashionable. The black metal scene in Scandinavia is a prime example. In Norway there's the notorious case of Varg Vikernes. There appears to be a particularly explosive form of national pride and socialist thinking. What is surprising is that I've scarcely heard of it coming from the U.S. Is this also part of what we can expect when we so badly want to become more like Europe?

That's some industrial grade crazy there.

Note that the DC gun laws didn't do thing one to keep this former felon and certified loon from getting one or more guns.

1. Only 24 books in the New Testament? Is he only using the Martin Luther -preferred version?

2. St. James translation?

3. Archaeology has "immutable laws?"

I'd take this guy marginally more seriously if he could show that he's even got the basics correct.

He is not crazy. It is an intellectually dishonest argument to dismiss this man as crazy. He dwelt on his hate of those who did not agree with him. He was not surrounded by people who disagreed with him. Most likely, his friends agreed with him or just sat around nodding his head. His coworkers probably avoided him because it was hard to hold a conversation with him.

It is very easy to learn the wrong lesson from history. Hitler was not crazy. He rose to power on a wave of hate. If you want to claim he was crazy, it becomes far too easy to excuse all of the pain caused by those who followed him.

"Another person attacking poor, oppressed Christians! Won't Christians ever get a break?"

Did you actually read the post, clown?

So he’s a fascist.

Fascism is a heresy of the left, not the right.

So, no, not a right-wing extremist, a left-wing extremist.

The shooter was one of those "right-wingers" who hated capitalism, Christianity, the GOP, Bush, Neocons, and Israel.

No wonder he is being used as a club by the DHS, Baloon Juice, Charles Johnson and Slate.com against the Tea Parties and Rush...

Sounds a bit like a numbskull version of Christopher Hitchens, doesn't he? I wonder if the media will link his shooting to the hate speech Hitchens aims at believers in the " jealous, wrathful, vengeful, unforgiving, genocidal, anthropomorphic tribal god (Jesus' father) created by Hebrews..."?

Uhhhh...a little research, just a minute or two of your time, would show you that he hated Liberals as quoted in his book. He hated Obama and yes Bush because he allowed Jews and Blacks and Christians into his administration. He hated Reagan and basically because he is ANTI-Government, he didn't believe in government rule so his hatred spread along both parties. This is a man that hated alot of people including Christians and anyone who didn't fit into his warped world.

Ah yes, the 9-11 truther angle. While I am not of the opinion that our government was involved (I have yet to see real evidence of that), I think it's equally ignorant to automatically write them off as raving lunatics for holding that view. It's not like Operation Northwoods or the Gulf of Tonkin incident would have given anyone the idea that our government might create a false flag incident, right?

This guy was plenty crazy without having to bring up the truther angle. That's just overkill.

Very Interesting. Thanks for posting.

Oh, Mike T, please. The troofers are, if not raving lunatics, at the very least, hopelessly stupid.

Consider the number of people who would have had to have been in on the plot, and reason forward from there. This is, as they say, not rocket science.

I mean, we're supposed to believe that this vast neo-con cabal was clever enough to carry off the biggest conspiracy of all time, without any of the many, many people who would have had to have been involved spilling the beans - and yet the very same cabal was too stupid to plant & publicize a bit of "evidence" of ongoing Saddamite WMD programs in the chaos of post-invasion Iraq - "evidence" that they desperately needed and wanted to find?

Please do try to connect the dots.

Oh Steve, please... it's not like I am defending them as having a good point, but saying that you cannot entirely fault them given our own government's history.

Now, why don't you address the issue about Operation Northwoods?

And for the record:

Consider the number of people who would have had to have been in on the plot, and reason forward from there. This is, as they say, not rocket science.

When you read about Operation Northwoods and consider how high up it got support, that should give you pause about using this as an argument. The best evidence I have that it wasn't an inside job is Al Qaeda's behavior.

Earth to Mike T: Operation Northwoods never got off the ground, and is now common knowledge.

Compare & contrast.

I blush for you.

Why did Von Brunn call his site "Holy Western Empire" and claim that Jews had messed up the Catholic Church? Von Brunn hated "Liberalism" too. Looks like a sectarian, anti-Republic Junker wannabe to me.

Earth to Mike T: Operation Northwoods never got off the ground, and is now common knowledge.

Earth to Steve: The point is that it is now common knowledge that high ranking members of our military proposed butchering innocent Americans and blowing up private property to create a fake casus belli. That would suggest to a rational person that it is not entirely out of the realm of possibility, no matter how improbable, that the federal government had SOME role in 9-11.

As I said, I don't believe they did have a role, as I have seen no evidence for it. However, if 30 years from now, it came out that they did, it wouldn't surprise me in the least given the federal government's history.

"The point is that it is now common knowledge that high ranking members of our military proposed butchering innocent Americans and blowing up private property to create a fake casus belli"

For some reason I'm having a de javu moment that I've seen that plot on 24 already. But I also have to admit that I dont trust our government in it's current state to not pull a stunt like that.

For those unfamiliar, Wikipedia has a decent run-down on "Operation Northwoods":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Anybody who thinks that the existence of this silly & abortive scheme from the days of the JFK administration lends any plausibility whatsoever to troofer claims about 9/11 is quite beyond my help.

But enough.

Anybody who thinks that the existence of this silly & abortive scheme from the days of the JFK administration lends any plausibility whatsoever to troofer claims about 9/11 is quite beyond my help.

"Silly and abortive?" That's a really kind way of putting it.

It does lend a microscopic level of plausibility to their claims. No matter how improbable that it was a conspiracy, it is not possible in light of Operation Northwoods coming out to say with certainty that a plan to allow a terrorist attack would never be supported at senior levels because senior military personnel actually proposed a terrorist attack on the American people.

Unlike you, I look to the fact that there is no actual evidence of any federal involvement as a sign that the truthers are wrong. However, I will give them credit when they attack people like you who cheerfully say "awww, the feds would NEVER consider letting that happen" when history proves you dead wrong.

Mike T: did I "say with certainty that a plan to allow a terrorist attack would never be supported at senior levels?"

Did I say "aww, the feds would NEVER consider letting that happen?"

Suggested answers: no & no.

Oh, and a lack of "actual evidence" is the least of the troofers' problems.

Personally, I find his screed more amusing than anything else (or, at least, amusing if he had not acted upon it)...

God willing, the "Aryan gene pool" myth will die a quick, and utterly "unwept, unhonored, and unsung," death, as is deserving; and the "Holocaust" and Christian religions will continue on long after the "race-theory"'s damnable lies lie trampled and broken in the mud.

Amen.

Suggested answers: no & no.

Oh, and a lack of "actual evidence" is the least of the troofers' problems.

Then why are quibbling with my point? My point was simply the fact that Operation Northwoods is positive proof that the government has considered something along the lines of the truthers' claims about 9/11. That simply means that no matter how improbable, it is now no longer impossible to credibly believe that it COULD happen.

The vast majority of those who sneer at the truthers have no clue that our own government has considered attacking its own people. They do so not based on a balanced view of the truthers' claims, but on the assumption that "it could never happen."

Beckwith's bringing up the truther angle was gratuitous. This nutjob's original writings were sufficient to condemn him.

Mike T:

I am quibbling with your point because it is so utterly silly.

My claim, which is that anybody would have to be out of his freaking mind to believe that the Bush administration could successfully have pulled off what the troofers claim they did on 9/11 in no way depends on the claim, which you seem to attribute to me, that no American officials could ever have proposed anything like the Northwoods operation.

DAVID LETTERMAN'S HATE, ETC. !

David Letterman's hate is as old as some ancient Hebrew prophets.
Speaking of anti-Semitism, it's Jerry Falwell and other fundy leaders who've gleefully predicted that in the future EVERY nation will be against Israel (an international first?) and that TWO-THIRDS of all Jews will be killed, right?
Wrong! It's the ancient Hebrew prophet Zechariah who predicted all this in the 13th and 14th chapters of his book! The last prophet, Malachi, explains the reason for this future Holocaust that'll outdo even Hitler's by stating that "Judah hath dealt treacherously" and "the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this" and asks "Why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother?"
Haven't evangelicals generally been the best friends of Israel and persons perceived to be Jewish? Then please explain the recent filthy, hate-filled, back-stabbing tirades by David Letterman (and Sandra Bernhard and Kathy Griffin) against a leading evangelical named Sarah Palin, and explain why most Jewish leaders have seemingly condoned Palin's continuing "crucifixion"!
While David, Sandra, and Kathy are tragically turning comedy into tragedy, they are also helping to speed up and fulfill the Final Holocaust a la Zechariah and Malachi, thus helping to make the Bible even more believable!
(For even more stunning information, visit MSN and type in "Separation of Raunch and State" and "Bible Verses Obama Avoids.")

Post a comment


Bold Italic Underline Quote

Note: In order to limit duplicate comments, please submit a comment only once. A comment may take a few minutes to appear beneath the article.

Although this site does not actively hold comments for moderation, some comments are automatically held by the blog system. For best results, limit the number of links (including links in your signature line to your own website) to under 3 per comment as all comments with a large number of links will be automatically held. If your comment is held for any reason, please be patient and an author or administrator will approve it. Do not resubmit the same comment as subsequent submissions of the same comment will be held as well.