William Dembski himself now responds to the debate between “Intelligent Design” theory (ID) and Aristotelico-Thomism (A-T) that has been raging recently at this blog and others. But I’m afraid he seems only to have made his position even less coherent than I gave it credit for in my original post. I explain how in a new post over at my own blog.
Dembski rolls snake eyes
by Edward Feser
Comments (1)
So...this wasn't bar dice?
Posted by Patrick | April 20, 2010 9:42 PM