What’s Wrong with the World

The men signed of the cross of Christ go gaily in the dark.


What’s Wrong with the World is dedicated to the defense of what remains of Christendom, the civilization made by the men of the Cross of Christ. Athwart two hostile Powers we stand: the Jihad and Liberalism...read more

Amish farmer in jail for selling salve

This is a good reminder that ridiculous prosecutorial aggression arises in all sorts of nooks and crannies unrelated to the culture war. The federal government is prosecuting an Amish farmer for selling an herbal salve that he believes cures cancer. Apparently the facts of the case aren't really very much in dispute. This blog post lays the facts, and the relevant legal "reasoning," out in some detail. See also here.

As the federal government sees it, if you make any healing claims for your product, including distributing pamphlets with anecdotal claims of healing from users, then you're by definition selling a drug. If you're selling a drug, then you have to be fully regulated by the FDA. This farmer at first made healing claims on the labeling of his product. Then he backed off on that repeatedly in response to demands by the FDA and judicial orders, until he got the labeling as required. However, meanwhile he also distributed pamphlets somewhere in the vicinity of the store where the salve was sold that made healing claims. Therefore, he's still an illegal drug seller across state lines.

This is pretty absurd. Let's just grant for the sake of the argument (though I'm not sure it's true) that the federal government has a legitimate interest in preventing cranks from making overblown or untested healing claims for their products. Be that as it may, there is something perverse in setting the laws up like a line of dominoes so that making such claims turns one into an illegal drug dealer and opens one up to many years in federal prison. Since there is obviously a vast difference between drug dealers and Amish farmers with (perhaps silly) ideas about the healing properties of chickweed salve, a set of laws that tries to punish one of these as if he were the other is unjust.

If we have to have federal laws that punish people for promulgating unwarranted claims about chickweed salve while selling it, why not make these free-standing laws against labeling or advertising with untested claims, or something to that effect? They could be punished by fines rather than prison time, make no attempt to define the products as "drugs," and be completely de-linked from drug trafficking laws. This seems only sane.

Let's face it, too: The prosecution on this sort of thing is obviously spotty at best. We've all seen healing claims made right on the label of herbal and alternative remedies that are unregulated by the FDA. So why are the feds coming down so hard on this one Amish farmer who (it sounds like) has been pretty compliant in his response to their original criticisms? At the most, they could have told him to stop distributing the pamphlets in question, if that was really that important to them. Since he'd complied on the labeling, he probably would have complied with that as well, and the whole incident could have been closed. Instead of which they are trying (it sounds like) to throw him in federal prison for many years. Which is crazy.

As I said at the outset, this is a reminder to culture warriors like me that such vindictiveness and overzealousness is not confined to people like Kenneth Miller. I've said for some time that the behavior of the federal prosecutors in those cases may have less to do with the homosexuality issue than one might think and more to do with prosecutors' egos and with maintaining a perception of being tough on crime. This story about the dangerous Amish chickweed salve seller, Samuel Girod, tends to confirm that interpretation. Let's hope things go better for Sam Girod than they did for Ken Miller.

Comments (2)

I've said for some time that the behavior of the federal prosecutors in those cases may have less to do with the homosexuality issue than one might think and more to do with prosecutors' egos and with maintaining a perception of being tough on crime

By picking targets too weak or otherwise disinclined to offer much resistance I'll add. It's a feature, not a bug. This is why it is so pleasing when faux-virtue governmental hacks pick a target who won't curl up and die*. Recall Ezra Levant's tangle with the Canadian Human Rights Commission when his magazine published cartoons of Mohammed too trenchant for prime time. At the end of the whole thing Levant remarked that he prevailed because he had backup and a team of lawyers willing to fight, but that we need to remember that the usual victims are little guys with no such resources.

Currently we are still awaiting a libel or defamation trial between Mark Steyn and Michael Mann. While the delays might be explainable by the usual bureaucratic sluggishness, I can't help but suspect there is a little deliberate feet-dragging because pro-Mann elements know they've stepped in it by challenging someone who won't be bullied and that if Steyn prevails, then Big Environmentalism's house of cards collapses.

And finally, I return to the anecdote of my friend in an undergrad music program who was hauled before an ad hoc star-chamber of faculty who threatened his academic advancement because someone witnessed him not joining a standing ovation for a professor who announced he was going transgender. I believe had he gone to the dean of men, the president, and finally the press, the bullies would have backed off. But college students are young and easily cowed when they just want to put their time in and move on to their careers, so they are willing to endure Leftist propaganda as long as it results in sheep skin for the resume. In any other context it would be called a racket. I've joke that someone should slap a few RICO indictments on colleges that force students to run the PC gauntlet (maybe try applying anti-hazing laws?). I get more serious as time goes on. Recently the Atlanta school district got caught changing grades and got RICO'ed, so there's precedent for going after educational institutions. It might take only one victory to change the education landscape.

*Best hair-salon name I've ever seen: Curl Up and Dye

What would Weird Al think? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOfZLb33uCg

Post a comment

Bold Italic Underline Quote

Note: In order to limit duplicate comments, please submit a comment only once. A comment may take a few minutes to appear beneath the article.

Although this site does not actively hold comments for moderation, some comments are automatically held by the blog system. For best results, limit the number of links (including links in your signature line to your own website) to under 3 per comment as all comments with a large number of links will be automatically held. If your comment is held for any reason, please be patient and an author or administrator will approve it. Do not resubmit the same comment as subsequent submissions of the same comment will be held as well.