What’s Wrong with the World

The men signed of the cross of Christ go gaily in the dark.


What’s Wrong with the World is dedicated to the defense of what remains of Christendom, the civilization made by the men of the Cross of Christ. Athwart two hostile Powers we stand: the Jihad and Liberalism...read more

Regionalism at The University Bookman

There is an old journal called The University Bookman, founded long ago by Russell Kirk, which ought to be more widely read. Its current issue is devoted to regionalism and localism, and it's magnificent. Like all good and noble localism, it is quirky but profound, pugnacious but openhearted, idiosyncratic but informative; to fierce polemic the writers add heavy dollops of levity, and they crown a certain playful crankishness with sparkling wisdom. The flavor of all this can be grasped, perhaps, in the fact that editor Gerald J. Russello contributes a short essay defiantly celebrating, of all places, Brooklyn. Or consider the marvelous opening lines of Jeremy Beer's uproarious ode to an unjustly forgotten Indiana writer by the name of Tarkington:

During a recent lecture, the eminent and usually trustworthy literary critic Joseph Epstein befuddled at least one audience member (me) by referring to Theodore Dreiser as the “greatest American author of the twentieth century.” Huh? Dreiser was not even the greatest twentieth-century author from Indiana.

But fear not, dear admirer of Epstein (I count myself as one), for the localist's generosity wins out in the end:
Joseph Epstein is an intelligent man. Theodore Dreiser’s adulation of power, modish leftism, and crackpot theories surely must not impress him. So why the admiration? In his talk, he mentioned that Dreiser wrote as the “ultimate outsider,” which gave him a comparative advantage in illuminating the American scene. Maybe. But I’m inclined to think that Epstein’s judgment is colored by the fact that Dreiser both began his career and set his best work, Sister Carrie (1900), in Epstein’s native Chicago. This must be a case of rank hometown prejudice. As such, I honor and respect it.

There is, indeed, a lot to be said about the localist's basic generosity. Unlike the universalist or the imperialist, he is quite prepared to give other places their due. He is not all full up on today's fashionable patriotism of supremacy. He is perfectly content to acknowledge that other locales, other regions, other countries have their virtues and their greatness. Or, even if they appear to have very little of either, he is still prepared to acknowledge that men can love even broken and subjugated places. His patriotism does not seek to crowd out everyone else's with the rhetoric of universals; there is nothing in him of that ideological fervor to bring everyone into conformity with the latest theories of human thriving.

In a word, the object of his patriotism may be small, but his heart is warm and full. He is moved to love for his home like decent men are moved to love and sympathy for frightened children and lost dogs. It is smallness, vulnerability and above all the tragedy of fleeting things that engenders his patriotism. One day the object of his love will be gone, and his solace is in the God who said that the created world is good, even its broken and subjugated parts.

Now here I have gone and added a little polemic to what was supposed to be just a notice about a fine publication. No matter. These essays will surely delight, amuse, challenge and inform you, whether you agree with my polemic or not.

Comments (3)

I really don't know whether to thank you for this or not, Mr. Cella. I fear my syllabi shall *never* get done if folk keep providing me links to so much fascinating, thoughtful, articulate material to read. The saving grace here is the interview with Ms. Rosen, because I can send my students to it for one of their research projects -- so it's not *really* procrastination to browse the publication; maybe I'll find more that's not just pure personal pleasure!

Booth Tarkington's book "Penrod" is one of the funniest things I've ever read. It's a bit like Dennis the Menace at novel length, but is written in a sort of mock-heroic style that makes it all the funnier. Growing up a boy in a small town, I can say that it really does capture the feel of that whole endeavor, with both the adventure and the goofiness of the thing being very well portrayed. It is slightly un-PC with regards to race, being a product of its time (the 20's, I believe) but it is in no way malicious. It takes a similar approach to race as did the Our Gang comedies.

And yes, The University Bookman is a fine journal.

I hope the good folks at ISI appreciate your efforts in alerting us to their treasures. I had the good fortune of attending a Conference they hosted back in November. They've only posted 4 (Richard Gamble, Daniel Larison and Ross Douhat spoke too) of the uniformly excellent presentations given to date. Folks should enjoy Esolen, Carlson, Dineen and Kalb here; http://www.firstprinciplesjournal.com/articles.aspx?article=1184&theme=home&loc=b

Held the Saturday after the election in drizzly, depressing weather, the lecture hall was overflowing with erudition and a joyful esprit de corps. I told Mark Henrie the next time to fly you up. I fear he awkwardly (for me anyways)mumbled something sounding like a solicitation for funds.

Post a comment

Bold Italic Underline Quote

Note: In order to limit duplicate comments, please submit a comment only once. A comment may take a few minutes to appear beneath the article.

Although this site does not actively hold comments for moderation, some comments are automatically held by the blog system. For best results, limit the number of links (including links in your signature line to your own website) to under 3 per comment as all comments with a large number of links will be automatically held. If your comment is held for any reason, please be patient and an author or administrator will approve it. Do not resubmit the same comment as subsequent submissions of the same comment will be held as well.